αcd8β antibody (Bio X Cell)
Structured Review

αcd8β Antibody, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 177 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/αcd8β antibody/product/Bio X Cell
Average 96 stars, based on 177 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Tissue Injury and Biomaterial Treatment Modulate Tumor Growth and Response to Immunotherapy"
Article Title: Tissue Injury and Biomaterial Treatment Modulate Tumor Growth and Response to Immunotherapy
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.02.02.703323
Figure Legend Snippet: VML Injury Impacts Anti-Tumor CD8 + T Cell Response. (A) Flow cytometric profiling of CT26 tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells, (B) PD1 expression on CD8 + T cells, and (C) CT26 tumor-specific CD8 + T cells marked by AH1-loaded MHC class I tetramer in uninjured and VML injured mice. (D) Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) of CT26 tumor-infiltrating T cells from uninjured and VML injured mice. UMAP depicting main T cell clusters (e.g., CD8, CD4, Treg, unconventional). (E) T cell UMAP separated by tumor-reactive AH1-Tetramer + CD8 + T cells (top) and other T cells (bottom) colored by cells from uninjured (gray) and VML injured (green) mice. (F) Differential gene expression and (G, H) GSEA using Hallmark or (I) curated list of T cell-related pathways with top leading edge genes comparing tumor-reactive AH1-Tetramer + CD8 + T cells of uninjured and VML injured mice. (J) Intracellular cytokine staining following ex vivo stimulation of IFNγ-producing effector cell types in CT26 tumors of uninjured and VML injured mice. (Statistics) Bar graphs: mean±SD. Normally distributed data (Shapiro-Wilk test, α=0.05) was analyzed using an unpaired two-tailed student t-test ( A-C, J ). Results representative of at least 2 independent experiments ( A-C ). NS: Not significant p>0.05, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01. UMAP: Uniform manifold approximation and projection. GSEA: Gene set enrichment analysis.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Single Cell, RNA Sequencing, Gene Expression, Staining, Ex Vivo, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: VML Injury Impacts Distant Tumor Growth by Engaging a Shared Tumor-Draining Lymph Node (tdLN). (A) Flow cytometric profiling of CD8 + T cells in CT26 tdLN, including effector memory differentiation (CD44 hi CD62L - ) and (B, C) activation (CD25 + , NKG2D + ) in uninjured and VML-injured mice. (D) The bilateral VML injury (square) was modified to a unilateral procedure performed on either the ipsilateral (triangle) or contralateral (inverted triangle) quadriceps muscle relative to the tumor-bearing flank. CT26 tumor growth kinetics of uninjured and VML-injured (bi-, ipsi-, and contra-lateral) mice (n=9-10). (E) Survival curve (volume >1500mm 3 or severe involuting ulceration) of CT26 tumor-bearing mice with ipsi-versus contra-lateral VML injury. (F) Inhibition of lymphocyte LN egress using FTY720 HCl (25 μg/mouse). Representative flow cytometry plots and quantification of CD3 + T cells in peripheral blood (collected at survival endpoint) to confirm successful sequestration of lymphocytes in LN/spleen. (G) CT26 tumor growth kinetics of uninjured and ipsilateral VML-injured mice treated with vehicle (solid) or FTY720 HCl (dashed) (n=9-10). (Statistics) Tumor growth curves: mean±SEM. Bar graphs: mean±SD ( D, E display earliest survival timepoint). For 2 groups, normally distributed data (Shapiro-Wilk test, α=0.05) was analyzed using an unpaired two-tailed student t-test ( B, C ); otherwise, a non-parametric two-tailed Mann-Whitney test was used ( A ). For >2 groups, data was analyzed using an ordinary one-way ( D ) or two-way ANOVA ( F, G ) with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (only relevant comparisons shown). Survival: Kaplan-Meier curve with Log-Rank Mantel-Cox test ( E ). Results representative of at least 2 independent experiments ( D, G ). NS: Not significant p>0.05, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001.
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Modification, Inhibition, Flow Cytometry, Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: Biomaterial Injury Treatment-Induced Type-2 Immunity Also Develops in Tumor-Associated Tissues and Contributes to Delayed Tumor Growth. (A) Flow cytometric profiling of B and T lymphocytes, (b) Tregs (CD4 + FoxP3 + CD25 + ), and (C) CD8 + /Treg ratio in CT26 tumor-draining lymph nodes (tdLNs) of uninjured and VML-injured (untreated and ECM-treated) mice. (D) Frequency of IL4-eGFP + CD4 + T cells (TH2) in CT26 tdLNs of VML-injured (untreated and ECM-treated) 4Get mice. (E) Type-2 cytokine (IL4 and IL13) production by CD4 + T cells in CT26 tdLNs of uninjured and VML-injured (untreated and ECM-treated) mice following ex vivo cell stimulation. (F) Frequency of IL4-eGFP + SiglecF + eosinophils and CD4 + T cells in CT26 tumor-encapsulating adipose of VML-injured (untreated and ECM-treated) 4Get mice. (G) IL4 neutralization: CT26 tumor growth and survival curves of VML-injured (untreated and ECM-treated) mice treated with isotype (solid) or αIL4 antibody (1 mg/mouse initial dose followed by 0.5 mg/mouse maintenance) (dashed) (n=9-10). (Statistics) Tumor growth curves: mean±SEM. Bar graphs: mean±SD. For 2 groups, normally distributed data (Shapiro-Wilk test, α=0.05) was analyzed using an unpaired, two-tailed student t-test ( D, F ). For >2 groups, data was analyzed using an ordinary one-way ( A-C, E ) or two-way ( G - only D20 ) ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Survival: Kaplan-Meier curve with Log-Rank Mantel-Cox test ( G ). NS: Not significant p>0.05, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.
Techniques Used: Ex Vivo, Cell Stimulation, Neutralization, Two Tailed Test

